facebook Problematic Partnerships: Financial Inclusion and Corpora... - Vigyaa
Close

Delete Collection?

Are you sure you want to delete this collection permanently?

Close

Delete Collection?

Are you sure you want to delete this collection permanently?

Everyone has a Story to Tell and an Experience to Share!

Let’s Start Writing
b89ffe60-e931-4c34-8253-532c1669217d

275 views

Problematic Partnerships: Financial Inclusion and Corporate Trends in Social Enterprise

A social enterprise develops market-based solutions to societal issues, and is legally required to place equal emphasis on both social and financial goals. In addition, all profits must be reinvested back into the organization's mission.

These requirements were developed in order to prevent self-serving behaviors that are common among corporate executives. However, without acknowledging that greedy executives are symptoms of a problematic economic system, social enterprises will not be prepared to address the root causes of inequality and will too easily turn to corporations when they themselves become stuck.

Social enterprise has it's roots in the modern microfinance movement, which began in the 1970s with the work of Muhammed Yunus and Dr. Akhtar Hameed Khan in Bangladesh and Pakistan respectively. While the idea of providing small loans to low-income communities for business and consumer use has lessened the burden of extreme poverty for some, microfinance has also been criticized for it's inability to eradicate poverty in full. 

Many within the industry argue that this failure is due to microfinance institutions' inability to “scale-up”, in other words, non-profit or social enterprise models cannot reach a larger population due to financial limitations. To address this perceived problem, financial and microfinance industry leaders developed a new strategy titled “financial inclusion” which brings for-profit banks into the picture. As a new approach to poverty reduction, financial inclusion is led by corporate banks that consciously expand their products and services to meet the needs of low-income communities.

Because “scale” has been identified as the issue within microfinance, the solution of collaborating with large corporations seems logical. However, microfinance was created as an alternative to for-profit cooperate banks. While the sentiment of banks caring about poor populations seems noble, there has been no systemic change within these cooperate banks to suggest that they would place the social needs of the poor before the bank's own interests.

The failure of microfinance rests in it's inability to recognize two key points: First, the dominant economic system is growing poverty at a rate that cannot be contained without systemic change and second, corporations manipulate public opinion to believe that social organizations cannot succeed without their intervention.

The recent shift from “microfinance” to “financial inclusion” could be indicative of the future of social enterprise industry as a whole unless there is significant change in philosophy and practice. Similar to critiques of microfinance, ability of social enterprises to achieve significant scale relative to the problems they seek to address has been called into question. In a 2011 survey of 439 African social enterprises, only 13% were found to be at scale. The most common response to this problem? Partnerships with corporate industry leaders are necessary to overcome obstacles to social change.

The social enterprise model celebrates a departure from traditional, “greedy” business models, and yet, does not call for changes to the capitalist system. This prevents organizations from addressing the root causes of problems of inequality. Social enterprises cannot openly criticize, call for action or address systemic problems which impede effective solutions. Social enterprises eventually turn to the larger corporations to help them reach more individuals, but the real issue of ineffectiveness does not lie in scale, but in the fact that only the surface issues are being addressed.

This is also true of social enterprises involved with “impact investors” who invest in social causes with profitable returns, although these profits are accepted to be significantly less than traditional business investments. Typically impact investors engage in corporate investments as well, and as a result, could be motivated to pull funding if a social enterprise offends a company or economic system which the investor supports.

So here we are with corporations not only causing inequality, but now becoming the leaders when it comes to finding a solution. Social enterprises exist because well-meaning founders decided that corporations are disconnected from communities in need and too concerned with profits. However, market-based solutions are problematic, because without admitting that the economic system itself is flawed, social entrepreneurs quickly become tangled in a web of financial politics. Without an open and honest dialogue among social entrepreneurs regarding the role large corporations have to play in continuing inequality, social enterprise is doomed to be nothing more than a buzzword.




Related Articles

Getting scammed has become a bigger issue today than it ever was in the past due to the way we conduct everyday transactions now. It’s much harder to scam somebody using a brick and mortar style of dealing. However, when the customer doesn’t know what they have till they have it, is a completely different story. A lot of shady sites out there will present the deal of a lifetime to you and you might even be tempted to buy into them. A classic case in point is Buy Shotgun of which there is an abundance out there, each trying to undercut the last. It’s because of this huge variety and extremely low prices that we tend to buy into such scams but there are ways to avoid getting scammed online.

If It’s Too Good to Be True, It Probably is

Some scams are easier to spot than others. These are the ones that are presenting absurdly low prices for the thing you are looking for. Take, for example, that you found an excellent price for a handgun on Buy Shotgun but then you see an ad for the same model of handgun but $100 cheaper than what the original site was offering it for. If the original value of the gun is significantly higher than the price the advertised website is offering then it probably is indeed a scam. When presented with a case that you aren’t sure could or could not be a scam, it’s often best to check the prices with other vendors and see how it stacks up against them. If it proves to be an outlier, then it most likely is a scam.

Look for Reviews, Check the Sites Reputation

A lot of online weapon stores are aware that the best way to gain a potential buyers trust is with reviews and that’s why you’ll often see that they have cherry-picked reviews on the website to show you how reliable and trustworthy they are. Unfortunately for them, however, there are also independent review websites (like google reviews) that you can use for a better picture of whether a site can be trusted or not. If the average rating of the site is less than or around 3/5 stars then it probably isn’t the best place to be purchasing something from. Good websites will have reviews somewhere between 4 and 5 stars and though it may have some criticisms about it, there will mostly be positive reviews to read.

Return Policy and Payment Methods

Though reviews can gain the trust of Buy Shotgun in your eyes, your credit card details aren’t something you want stolen during any online transaction. Therefore, it is wise to ensure that a safe payment method is present for transactions for that website. Alternatively, setting up a pin/code verification for online transactions is also another way to add security but having details stolen can be troublesome in itself. Furthermore, what is the websites return policy? Are they going to give cashback? What is the time that they allow you to test the handgun? These are all important questions that you should have the answer to before you buy a gun from a website so that it insures you from a faulty weapon. Perhaps you don’t exactly like the feel of the handgun you just purchased, in that case as well you may want a refund. However, in the latter case you may have to pay a small restocking fee.

Reference Image
Close