Delete Collection?

Are you sure you want to delete this collection permanently?


Delete Collection?

Are you sure you want to delete this collection permanently?

Everyone has a Story to Tell and an Experience to Share!

Let’s Start Writing

Problematic Partnerships: Financial Inclusion and Corporate Trends in Social Enterprise

A social enterprise develops market-based solutions to societal issues, and is legally required to place equal emphasis on both social and financial goals. In addition, all profits must be reinvested back into the organization's mission.

These requirements were developed in order to prevent self-serving behaviors that are common among corporate executives. However, without acknowledging that greedy executives are symptoms of a problematic economic system, social enterprises will not be prepared to address the root causes of inequality and will too easily turn to corporations when they themselves become stuck.

Social enterprise has it's roots in the modern microfinance movement, which began in the 1970s with the work of Muhammed Yunus and Dr. Akhtar Hameed Khan in Bangladesh and Pakistan respectively. While the idea of providing small loans to low-income communities for business and consumer use has lessened the burden of extreme poverty for some, microfinance has also been criticized for it's inability to eradicate poverty in full. 

Many within the industry argue that this failure is due to microfinance institutions' inability to “scale-up”, in other words, non-profit or social enterprise models cannot reach a larger population due to financial limitations. To address this perceived problem, financial and microfinance industry leaders developed a new strategy titled “financial inclusion” which brings for-profit banks into the picture. As a new approach to poverty reduction, financial inclusion is led by corporate banks that consciously expand their products and services to meet the needs of low-income communities.

Because “scale” has been identified as the issue within microfinance, the solution of collaborating with large corporations seems logical. However, microfinance was created as an alternative to for-profit cooperate banks. While the sentiment of banks caring about poor populations seems noble, there has been no systemic change within these cooperate banks to suggest that they would place the social needs of the poor before the bank's own interests.

The failure of microfinance rests in it's inability to recognize two key points: First, the dominant economic system is growing poverty at a rate that cannot be contained without systemic change and second, corporations manipulate public opinion to believe that social organizations cannot succeed without their intervention.

The recent shift from “microfinance” to “financial inclusion” could be indicative of the future of social enterprise industry as a whole unless there is significant change in philosophy and practice. Similar to critiques of microfinance, ability of social enterprises to achieve significant scale relative to the problems they seek to address has been called into question. In a 2011 survey of 439 African social enterprises, only 13% were found to be at scale. The most common response to this problem? Partnerships with corporate industry leaders are necessary to overcome obstacles to social change.

The social enterprise model celebrates a departure from traditional, “greedy” business models, and yet, does not call for changes to the capitalist system. This prevents organizations from addressing the root causes of problems of inequality. Social enterprises cannot openly criticize, call for action or address systemic problems which impede effective solutions. Social enterprises eventually turn to the larger corporations to help them reach more individuals, but the real issue of ineffectiveness does not lie in scale, but in the fact that only the surface issues are being addressed.

This is also true of social enterprises involved with “impact investors” who invest in social causes with profitable returns, although these profits are accepted to be significantly less than traditional business investments. Typically impact investors engage in corporate investments as well, and as a result, could be motivated to pull funding if a social enterprise offends a company or economic system which the investor supports.

So here we are with corporations not only causing inequality, but now becoming the leaders when it comes to finding a solution. Social enterprises exist because well-meaning founders decided that corporations are disconnected from communities in need and too concerned with profits. However, market-based solutions are problematic, because without admitting that the economic system itself is flawed, social entrepreneurs quickly become tangled in a web of financial politics. Without an open and honest dialogue among social entrepreneurs regarding the role large corporations have to play in continuing inequality, social enterprise is doomed to be nothing more than a buzzword.

Related Articles

There is no lack of evidence to support the fact that professionals in the sales sector can achieve performances which are superior to the average professional in the field when they are provided consistent and high-quality sales coaching from their mentors or their managers. The coach assigned with the task works to create improvements in the sales performances of the professionals.

These can be seen in the form of an increase in revenue, acquiring bigger deals, attaining higher close rates, negotiation of higher margins, deeper account penetration, and selling solutions among other major factors. The sales coach does this through imparting a direction and feedback on the performance of the sales professionals, using methods which are tried and tested through analysis of hundreds of sales measurement projects with the participation of organizations from over seventy countries across the world.

To decide whether you require the help of formal sales coaching is done through inspection of the current state of your sales teams and answer some important questions. First, you need to see if the sales goals, which were penned down by you, are being left incomplete due to your sales team having a few 2nd or 3rd quality members. Try to sense if the level of motivation in your sales team is low despite the best efforts of your sales leaders. Ask yourself if you would agree that formal sales coaching can play a role in uplifting the level of performances that your sales representatives have been delivering.

Sales leaders and managers benefit a lot from the core coaching skills and tools which are provided through this coaching. These are essential when it comes to the facilitation of the development of the sales team, which they lead with the help of a consistent process. The focus of the program lies towards contribution to the high level of performance from the sales team through the creation of standards of performance in clear sales, the tools and processes required to make successful sales.

This is accompanied by regular constructive feedback to the sales team for improving the methods and their efficiencies as they work on the development and monitor their sales plans for improvement in their performances. The workshop works for developing the optimal sales strategies, imparting the required knowledge as skills for your professionals and increase the engagement of your sales team along with their satisfaction to create a conductive environment for higher performances.

Reference Image